The written contract can only relate to the agreed ALS. The contract can then last two years, but ALS can be reviewed quarterly.B. This too often reduces the administrative burden of reviewing contracts. Unlike coercion and undue influence in cases of illegitimate pressure or alleged unlawful influence, which depends on an abuse of trust, other cases of a vulnerable person avoid an agreement simply because they are vulnerable and exploited. In the Medina, the Court of Appeal found that a group of pilgrims who had sunk on a Red Sea rock did not have to pay $4,000 promised to a rescue ship because the “saviors” had taken advantage of the vulnerable situation of the pilgrims. To avoid unfair enrichment, the Court replaced an arbitration award of $1800. Similarly, in Cresswell, Ms. Cresswell gave her ex-husband her share of her common assets in exchange for the release of mortgage repayments, which then earned her a profit of $1400. As Potter took advantage of Ms.
Creswell`s ignorance of real estate transactions, Megarry J felt that the agreement was void.  One possible exception to this model, which is now very limited, is the “no is factum” defence, which originally applied in the 19th century in favour of illiterates who allowed a person to invalidate a signed contract if it was fundamentally different from what he intended to do.  In Lloyds Bank Ltd/Bundy, Lord Denning MR suggested that it was time to place all cases in a single doctrine of “unequal bargaining power”.  This would have allowed an agreement to be avoided if, in the absence of independent advice, a person`s ability to negotiate on better terms had been seriously compromised and had essentially given the courts more leeway to amend contracts for the benefit of weaker parties. The idea of a uniform general doctrine was rejected by some members of the House of Lords from 1979.  However, specific legislation such as the Consumer Credit Act 1974, the Landlord and Tenant Act of 1985 or the Employment Rights Act of 1996 create specific rights for contracting parties that lack bargaining power, as well as specific legislation that rewrites a disclosure obligation and good faith. Just as there is no uniform theory of bargaining power, a uniform doctrine of contractual freedom was dismantled long ago, where the parties do not do business in the course of business.  In commercial cases, the courts do not readily accept a company`s accepting of an agreement that it considers unfair or that it contains inappropriate clauses. If there is no ad idem consensus between the parties (agreement on identical terms), there is no contract to be interpreted as such for the Tribunal. It is not for the Tribunal to create the terms of the contract and thereby impose a contract on the parties.